Can Oneness be the Enlightenment ?
Introduction
It
is important to discern enlightenment or Nirvana described in Buddhism from
other similar concepts in different western and eastern spiritual teaching and
practices. Even though it seems that these differences are not so critical ,
they create a lot confusion when it
comes to understanding them with clarity. This is an effort to ease the
struggle and shed a light on certain critical principles, concepts and
practices with the view of contrasting and comparing so that ambiguities are
cleared.
What
is Unity or Oneness ?
Advaita
Vedanta is a school of Hindu philosophy that emphasizes the idea of non-dualism
or Advaita. According to this philosophy, the ultimate reality or Brahman is a
single, eternal, and indivisible consciousness that pervades everything in the
universe.
Unity
or oneness, therefore, is a fundamental concept in Advaita Vedanta. It is the
realization that there is no separation between the individual self (jiva) and
the ultimate reality (Brahman). The individual self is seen as a limited
expression of Brahman, and the true nature of the self is identical with
Brahman.
The
path to realizing this unity involves removing the ignorance or avidya that
creates the illusion of separation between the self and the ultimate reality.
This is done through spiritual practices such as self-inquiry (atma-vichara),
meditation, and the study of sacred texts such as the Upanishads and the
Bhagavad Gita.
The
ultimate goal of Advaita Vedanta is to achieve liberation (moksha) from the
cycle of birth and death by realizing the true nature of the self as Brahman.
What
is the difference between Moksha in Vedanta and Nirvana in Buddhism ?
Moksha
in Vedanta and Nirvana in Buddhism are similar concepts in that they both
represent the ultimate goal of spiritual practice, which is the liberation from
suffering and the attainment of a state of permanent bliss and peace. However,
there are some differences between the two concepts:
Ultimate
reality: In Vedanta, the ultimate reality is
seen as a single, eternal, and indivisible consciousness or Brahman, which
pervades everything in the universe. In Buddhism, the ultimate reality is seen
as emptiness or shunyata, which is the absence of inherent existence in all
phenomena.
Self: In Vedanta, the self or Atman is seen as
identical with Brahman. The individual self is a limited expression of Brahman,
and the true nature of the self is non-different from Brahman. In Buddhism,
there is no self or soul that is separate from the world, and the concept of
self is seen as an illusion or a mental construct.
Path
to liberation: In Vedanta, the
path to liberation involves the removal of ignorance (avidya) and the
realization of the true nature of the self as Brahman through spiritual
practices such as self-inquiry, meditation, and the study of sacred texts. In
Buddhism, the path to liberation involves the Four Noble Truths, which include
the recognition of suffering, the causes of suffering, the cessation of
suffering, and the path to the cessation of suffering, which involves the
Eightfold Path.
Liberation: In Vedanta, liberation or moksha is the
realization of the true nature of the self as Brahman, which is permanent and
eternal. In Buddhism, Nirvana is the state of liberation from suffering, which
is described as a state of non-attachment, non-grasping, and non-identification
with phenomena. It is often described as the cessation of all mental
afflictions and the attainment of peace and bliss. However, Nirvana is not seen
as a permanent state or a permanent state of being.
Purpose
of liberation: In Vedanta, the
purpose of liberation is to end the cycle of birth and death and attain eternal
happiness and peace. The liberated person is seen as being one with Brahman and
having transcended the limitations of the body and mind. In Buddhism, the
purpose of liberation is not only for oneself but also for the benefit of all
sentient beings. The liberated person is seen as having overcome the delusions
and afflictions that cause suffering and being able to guide others on the path
to liberation.
Role
of the teacher: In Vedanta, the
teacher or guru plays an important role in guiding the student on the path to
liberation. The teacher is seen as someone who has already attained liberation
and can help the student remove their ignorance and realize their true nature. In
Buddhism, while the teacher is still important, the emphasis is more on
personal effort and individual realization. The Buddha is seen as a guide and a
model for the path to liberation, but ultimately each individual must find
their own way.
Oneness/Unity
in Buddhism
In
Buddhism, the concept of oneness or unity is expressed through the teaching of
interdependence or dependent origination (pratitya-samutpada). This teaching
emphasizes that all phenomena are interdependent and arise in dependence upon
other phenomena. Nothing exists independently or in isolation. This view of
interdependence is often referred to as the "non-dual" perspective in
Buddhism.
However,
Buddhism does not posit an ultimate reality or self that is identical with all
phenomena, as is the case in Vedanta. Instead, Buddhism teaches that all
phenomena are empty of inherent existence, or shunyata. This means that
phenomena do not possess any independent or inherent nature, and their
existence is dependent upon other phenomena.
Therefore,
while both Vedanta and Buddhism recognize the interconnectedness of all things,
they differ in their understanding of the ultimate nature of reality and the
self. Vedanta posits an eternal, indivisible consciousness or Brahman that is
identical with the self, while Buddhism emphasizes the non-dual perspective of
interdependence and the emptiness of all phenomena.
Difference
between Oneness in Vedanta and Dependent Origination in Buddhism
Oneness
in Vedanta and dependent origination in Buddhism are two different concepts
that describe the nature of reality in their respective traditions.
Oneness
in Vedanta is the idea that the ultimate reality or Brahman is a single,
eternal, and indivisible consciousness that pervades everything in the
universe. The individual self (jiva) is seen as a limited expression of
Brahman, and the true nature of the self is identical with Brahman. The path to
realizing this oneness involves removing the ignorance or avidya that creates
the illusion of separation between the self and the ultimate reality.
Dependent
origination in Buddhism is the teaching that all phenomena arise in dependence
upon other phenomena. Nothing exists independently or in isolation, and
everything is interconnected. The teaching of dependent origination emphasizes
the interdependent nature of reality, and how everything is influenced by
causes and conditions that are constantly changing.
What
is Emptiness or Shunyatha ?
Let's
take the example of a table. From a conventional or relative perspective, we
can say that the table exists and has certain characteristics such as shape,
color, and function. However, from an ultimate or absolute perspective, the
table is empty of inherent or permanent existence.
This
means that the table does not exist independently or in isolation. It arises in
dependence upon other factors, such as the wood, the carpenter who made it, the
tools used, and the environment in which it exists. The table is constantly
changing and impermanent, and it does not have an inherent or fixed nature.
Furthermore,
the concept of a "table" is a mental construct or label that we apply
to the collection of phenomena that we perceive as a table. This label is not
an inherent characteristic of the table itself, but a designation that we give
it based on our mental conventions and cultural conditioning.
Therefore,
when we recognize the emptiness or shunyata of the table, we understand that it
is not a fixed and permanent entity, but a collection of changing and dependent
phenomena that arise in dependence upon other factors. This recognition of
emptiness can lead to a deeper understanding of the interdependent nature of
all phenomena and the cessation of attachment to fixed concepts and mental
constructs.
The
concept of shunyata or emptiness extends beyond the example of a table and
applies to all phenomena, including the self. In Buddhism, the self is seen as
a collection of ever-changing mental and physical phenomena that arise in
dependence upon other factors. There is no fixed or permanent self that exists
independently or in isolation.
This
recognition of the emptiness or shunyata of the self can lead to a profound
shift in one's understanding of reality and the nature of suffering. When we
recognize that the self is empty of inherent existence, we see that our
experiences of pleasure, pain, and suffering arise in dependence upon other
factors and are impermanent. This understanding can lead to the cessation of
attachment to the self and the alleviation of suffering.
It
is important to note that the concept of shunyata or emptiness does not imply
nihilism or the denial of the existence of phenomena. Instead, it points to the
dependent and impermanent nature of all phenomena and the emptiness of a fixed
and permanent self or essence.
Shunyatha
vs nihilism
Shunyata
or emptiness and nihilism are two distinct philosophical concepts. While they
may appear similar on the surface, there are some fundamental differences
between them. Here are some of the key differences between shunyata and nihilism:
Nature
of Reality: Shunyata is the Buddhist concept
that all phenomena are empty of inherent or permanent existence. It emphasizes
the dependent and impermanent nature of all phenomena, including the self.
Nihilism, on the other hand, is the belief that nothing exists, that everything
is meaningless and lacks purpose.
Dependent
Arising: In Buddhism, the concept of
dependent arising emphasizes the interdependent nature of all phenomena. All
things arise in dependence upon other factors, and there is no fixed or
permanent essence to anything. Nihilism, on the other hand, denies the
existence of any inherent or meaningful relationships between things.
Ethics: Shunyata emphasizes the importance of ethical
behavior and actions that arise from a deep understanding of the interdependent
nature of all things. Nihilism, on the other hand, often leads to a disregard
for ethics and morality, as there is no inherent meaning or purpose to life.
Attitude
towards life: The Buddhist
view of shunyata recognizes that while all phenomena are ultimately empty, they
still exist conventionally and have relative value. Nihilism, on the other
hand, rejects any inherent value or meaning to life and can lead to despair,
apathy, and a lack of motivation.
To
illustrate these differences, let's take the example of a flower. From a
shunyata perspective, the flower is empty of inherent or permanent existence.
It arises in dependence upon other factors such as the seed, soil, water,
sunlight, and so on. The flower is constantly changing and impermanent, and it
does not have an inherent or fixed nature.
Nihilism,
on the other hand, might argue that the flower does not exist at all, that it
is an illusion or a mental construct. This attitude towards reality denies the
existence of the flower and any inherent value or meaning that it might have.
Furthermore,
while shunyata recognizes the relative value of conventional reality, nihilism
tends to reject any meaning or purpose to life altogether. This can lead to a
sense of despair, apathy, and nihilistic attitudes and behaviors.
Another
example that highlights the difference between shunyata and nihilism is the
concept of the self. In Buddhism, the self is seen as empty of inherent
existence, constantly changing and arising in dependence upon other factors.
This understanding of the self is important because it can lead to a deeper
understanding of the interdependent nature of all things and alleviate
suffering.
Nihilism,
on the other hand, may argue that the self does not exist at all, that it is an
illusion or a mental construct. This attitude towards the self can lead to a
sense of meaninglessness and despair and can also lead to a disregard for
ethical behavior and actions.
Nirvana
in Buddhism
Nirvana
is a central concept in Buddhism, and it refers to the ultimate goal of the
Buddhist path. It is often described as a state of freedom from suffering and
the cycle of rebirth.
According
to the Buddha, nirvana is the ultimate state of peace, happiness, and
liberation. It is a state of complete freedom from all mental and emotional
suffering. In Buddhist philosophy, nirvana is seen as the highest goal of human
existence, and it is attained through the practice of the Eightfold Path, which
includes right understanding, intention, speech, action, livelihood, effort,
mindfulness, and concentration.
The
Buddha described nirvana as a state of complete and perfect understanding,
where one realizes the true nature of reality and achieves a profound sense of
peace and contentment. It is a state of non-attachment, where one is free from
all forms of craving and clinging. The Buddha also described nirvana as a state
of ego lessness, where the illusion of a fixed and permanent self is dissolved,
and one experiences a sense of interconnectedness with all beings.
While
the exact nature of nirvana is difficult to describe in words, the Buddha used
various metaphors and analogies to explain it. For example, he compared nirvana
to the extinguishing of a flame, where all the fuel of suffering has been
consumed and the flame of existence is finally extinguished. He also compared
nirvana to the cooling of a fever, where all the heat and agitation of the mind
has been calmed and one experiences a deep sense of peace and tranquility.
Difference
between Shunyatha and Nirvana
Shunyata
and Nirvana are both key concepts in Buddhist philosophy, but they represent
slightly different aspects of the path to liberation.
Shunyata,
or emptiness, refers to the idea that all phenomena lack inherent existence or
self-nature. According to Buddhist philosophy, everything in the universe
arises dependently and is therefore empty of any independent existence. This
means that everything is interconnected and interdependent, and there is no
fixed or permanent self.
Nirvana,
on the other hand, refers to the state of ultimate liberation and freedom from
suffering that is attained through the realization of shunyata. It is often
described as a state of complete peace, happiness, and contentment.
Here
are some key differences between shunyata and nirvana:
Shunyata
is a philosophical concept that describes the nature of reality, while Nirvana
is a state of being that is achieved through the practice of the Buddhist path.
Shunyata
emphasizes the emptiness or lack of inherent existence of all phenomena, while
Nirvana emphasizes the attainment of a state of ultimate peace and freedom from
suffering.
Shunyata
is a realization that can be achieved through the practice of meditation and
contemplation, while Nirvana is a goal that is reached through the cultivation
of wisdom, ethical conduct, and mindfulness.
Shunyata
is an intellectual understanding of the nature of reality, while Nirvana is a
direct experience of that reality.
In
some Buddhist traditions, Nirvana is described as a state of non-dual
awareness, where the individual realizes the interdependence and
interconnectedness of all phenomena, and sees through the illusions of the ego
and the dualistic nature of reality. This realization leads to a complete
cessation of suffering and the attainment of ultimate peace and happiness.
It's
important to note that Nirvana is not seen as a permanent state of being, but rather
a non- state that cannot be be experienced and maintained through continued
practice and effort.
In
this state, there is no separation between subject and object, self and other,
or any other dichotomies that we normally perceive in our everyday experience.
Instead, there is a profound sense of unity and interconnectedness with all
beings and phenomena.
It's
important to note, however, that the experience of non-duality can be difficult
to describe or put into words, as it transcends the limitations of language and
conceptual thinking. It is something that must be experienced directly through
the practice of meditation and other spiritual practices.
Overall,
the experience of Nirvana can be considered non-dual in the sense that it
transcends the normal distinctions and dichotomies of our everyday experience
and offers a profound realization of unity and interconnectedness.
Nondual
Awareness and Science
The
concept of non-dual awareness can be difficult to understand from a Western
scientific perspective, as it is rooted in Eastern spiritual traditions and is
not easily described or measured by empirical methods.
However,
one way to approach the concept of non-dual awareness from a scientific
perspective is to look at the research on meditation and the effects it has on
the brain. Studies have shown that long-term meditation practice can lead to
changes in the brain that are associated with increased empathy, decreased
activity in the default mode network (DMN), and increased activity in the
insula, which is associated with interoceptive awareness (1).
These
changes in the brain suggest that meditation can lead to a shift in awareness
away from the default mode of thinking and towards a more direct and present
experience of reality. This shift can be described as a move away from
dualistic thinking, where there is a clear separation between the self and the
external world, and towards a more holistic and integrated understanding of
reality.
In
terms of Nirvana, the experience of non-dual awareness is often described in Vedanta
as a direct realization of the interconnectedness of all phenomena, including
the self and the external world. This realization goes beyond intellectual
understanding and involves a direct experience of oneness or unity with all
things.
While
this may seem mystical or difficult to grasp from a Western scientific
perspective, it is important to remember that science is always evolving and
expanding our understanding of the world. Just as our understanding of the
brain and consciousness is constantly evolving, so too is our understanding of
spiritual practices and experiences like Nirvana.
It
is also important to note that the concept of non-dual awareness is not unique
to Buddhism or other Eastern spiritual traditions. The concept of oneness or
unity can also be found in various Western spiritual and philosophical
traditions, including Christianity, Judaism, and Platonism.
From
a scientific perspective, the concept of non-dual awareness can be seen as a
shift in consciousness from a dualistic mode of thinking to a more integrated
and holistic mode of thinking. This shift has been studied in various contexts,
including psychedelic experiences, where individuals report a profound sense of
oneness and unity with all things.
For
example, a study conducted by researchers at Imperial College London found that
psilocybin, a psychoactive compound found in magic mushrooms, can lead to a
shift in consciousness towards a more non-dual state (1). Participants in the
study reported a profound sense of unity and interconnectedness with all
things, and this experience was associated with changes in brain activity in
regions associated with the default mode network and the sense of self.
Summary
It
is very clear that there are shuttle differences among the concepts of oneness,
non-duality, emptiness, dependent origination and enlightenment. As
enlightenment is an experience which cannot be described by using language, it
is obvious that it is a struggle when
someone tries to comprehend something
incomprehensible. What the finite mind can do is to make an assumption of what
it is and interpret by using words. The
language of enlightenment is the direct experience of it and become silent.
Comments
Post a Comment